About

Independent Kaspa guide, edited for claim discipline.

Kaspa Explained is an independent public reference for understanding Kaspa without price targets, exchange rumors, or roadmap confusion. It is Kaspa-positive, but it is not official and it is not investment advice.

Last updated: May 4, 2026. Status-sensitive pages should be rechecked after June 20, 2026, or sooner if primary technical sources update Toccata, DAGKnight, vProgs, RTD-derived systems, or activation status.

Who, how, why

The method in one screen.

Who

Kaspa Explained is independently maintained as a Kaspa-positive research guide. It is not an official Kaspa site, not neutral financial advice, and not a market-timing service.

How

Updates start from the strongest available source for the claim: code, releases, KIPs, research papers, protocol docs, and direct technical context before public summaries or social posts.

Why

The site exists to make Kaspa understandable without confusing shipped network behavior with targeted upgrades, roadmap architecture, research, or community hopes.

Editorial policy

What the site is trying to do.

Explain, then label status

Kaspa ideas are separated into live, targeted, roadmap, and research lanes. The goal is to make the protocol understandable without treating future architecture as shipped software.

Use stronger sources for stronger claims

Code, releases, KIPs, research papers, protocol documentation, and direct technical posts carry shipped-feature claims. Community articles, interviews, learning libraries, and X posts are useful context but weaker evidence for activation status.

Keep crypto in its lane

The site does not argue that blockchains fix every database, payment, legal, privacy, or real-world verification problem. Kaspa is evaluated where credible shared state matters.

Corrections

How mistakes should be handled.

If a status claim is wrong or stale, the correction should change the public page and the supporting context files together. For visible content, the corrected page should say what changed when the change is material to readers.

Highest priority

Wrong live/roadmap/research status, wrong activation timing, broken source hierarchy, or wording that implies investment advice.

Normal priority

Broken links, unclear explanations, stale comparison wording, glossary gaps, missing cross-links, or diagrams that could be clearer.

Disclosures

What this site is not.

Next step

Check the current status page.

Use the status page when you need the fastest answer to what is live, what is targeted, what is roadmap, and what remains research.

Open status